The man - who has lived in Australia for 42 years also claimed that a Google search for his name brought up stories about an unsolved shooting in 2004, causing damage to his reputation leading him to be ostracised within his migrant community.
A jury found Google liable for defamation in the Victorian Supreme court yesterday - a first in Australian history.
Google argued in court that it was not a publisher and therefore could not be held responsible.
Its search processes were automated and based on algorithms that crawl the web for content, Google said.
The jury had to deliberate on two separate issues: the first was the publication of a photo of the man that appeared on Google's image search.
The second had to do with a URL that appeared on Google's web search that linked to a web page containing the defamatory content, which included the man's image.
The jury found that Google was able to rely on the defence of "innocent dissemination" up until 2009 when the man's solicitors contacted Google to have the image removed.
However, it found that when it came to the URL, the man did not follow the proper process of reporting offensive content by Google - which can be achieved by filling out a form on its website and that Google was therefore not liable.
In a damages hearing this morning, Google argued that it could not be a publisher as a matter of law as search engine operators are "active intermediaries", but Justice Beach of the Victorian Supreme Court rejected Google's argument.
Justice Beach reserved judgement on damages and expects to deliver that ruling on Monday.
The man told News Ltd that he was pleased by the decision.
"This has been a big long battle I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy," he said.
"I've lived in Australia (for) 41 years. This case is not about money, it's about protecting my family, my children and reputation.''
The man said he has been shunned from local businesses that he has patronised for years.
"I used to go (to) a little restaurant every week. Now people won't talk to me," he said.
"Google needs to be held accountable."
Google declined to comment.
The ruling comes almost eight months after the man won a similar case against Yahoo! who was ordered by the Victorian Supreme Court to pay damages of $225,000.
Calendar
